In chapter three, King starts to shift the mood, although his notation that all Indians fall into one of three categories-“Dead Indians, Live Indians, and Legal Indians”-seems to indicate that he will continue the amusing diatribes and comic observations. All those feathers, all that face paint,” and, of course, “the skimpy loincloth” which so many movie Indians continue to sport quite provocatively.

“Hollywood has had a longstanding love affair with Indians,” explains King. Like any good entertainer, King warms up his audience by opening with not just a joke but two chapters of jokes on how European settlers and their descendants, especially those in Hollywood, have viewed those who were here before them through a kind of romantic noble savage haze. Quite intentionally described by the author as an “account” and not a “history,” the work is an at times glib, often funny, yet always serious observation of what it meant and means to be a Cherokee, Sioux, Mohawk, or one of the hundreds of tribal peoples that have been recklessly, sadly, and injuriously lumped together into the meaningless if convenient grouping called “Indian.” One such entertainment is King’s new book, The Inconvenient Indian: A Curious Account of Native People in North America. “What we are left with is a series of entertainments.” “Most of the history of Indians in North America has been forgotten,” says Canadian (and Cherokee) author Thomas King. Glib humor gives way to serious discussion of historic and modern treatment of Indians. University of Minnesota Press ( Sep 1, 2012) A Curious Account of Native People in North America

The inconvenient indian review